Our framework complements the industrial process perspective by expressing governance in mission-planning terms so that autonomous agents remain both effective and safe in dynamic environments. We technically implement this framework by encoding mission-planning artifacts as specific, version-controlled data entities within the Agent Registry.
A central governance challenge for autonomous agents is the Problem of Cumulative Operational Authority. An agent’s effective permissions are not a fixed set granted at deployment; they expand dynamically at runtime through transient, context-dependent delegation from users, tools, and other systems. The result is an emergent, unpredictable blast radius that cannot be assessed through static analysis alone.
Traditional Identity and Access Management (IAM) systems like RBAC and ABAC assume determinism and are architecturally incapable of governing non-deterministic agents whose authority is emergent and context-dependent. This creates a critical enforcement gap at the last mile—at the moment of action.
A Concept of Operations (CONOPS) is a doctrine used in military and government planning that provides a clear and concise vision of a mission from start to finish. It focuses on defining the high-level objectives (the "why," known as Commander's Intent) and empowers subordinates to use their judgment and creativity (Disciplined Initiative) to handle unpredictable situations on the ground while staying aligned with the overall goal.
Why it applies to Agentic AI Governance: Deploying autonomous agents into complex enterprise environments is a high-stakes operation. You cannot script every possible action or predict every scenario. The CONOPS framework is the perfect analogue. It allows you to define the strategic "why" for your AI agents and then trust them to execute, knowing you have a system in place to ensure every action, no matter how tactical, remains aligned with the strategic mission.
Our platform translates high-level mission objectives into real-time, automated governance controls.
The agent’s complete, versioned profile in the Agent Registry constitutes its formal CONOPS. It captures the agent’s purpose, approved capabilities and tools, data domains and environments, delegation boundaries, and policy thresholds. The runtime plane instantiates this baseline into its contextual graph and evaluates every privilege request against the CONOPS-defined objectives and constraints.
Commander’s Intent is represented in Layer 10 of the Agent Registry as the agent’s mission and intent. It conveys the strategic objective and acceptable end state, enabling the agent to act under uncertainty while remaining aligned to organizational aims. Real-time decisions reference this intent to determine whether a requested action advances the mission within risk tolerances.
Permitted tasks describe the discrete activities the agent is allowed to perform (e.g., preparing a quarterly report). Operational constraints articulate the directives and limits that govern those activities (e.g., read-only access, no export of personal data). During evaluation, the runtime layer matches a privilege request to the relevant permitted task(s) and applies the applicable constraints.
The overall governance system embodies the philosophy of Mission Command. It provides the "Commander's Intent" and the specific "Tasks and Directives" via the Registry. The agent is then empowered to exercise disciplined initiative—formulating its own plan of action (the "how")—to achieve its goals, while the system's real-time controls ensure this initiative remains within acceptable, governed bounds.
Learn how our CONOPS-based approach provides the trust and control needed for mission-critical AI. Schedule a demo to see how we align every autonomous action with your strategic intent.
Request a Demo