What banks operating across the Americas need to know about Brazil's LGPD, Canada's PIPEDA and stalled federal reform, and the fast-moving wave of Latin American data protection legislation — with practical guidance for building regional compliance baselines.
The Americas region presents a complex privacy landscape split between two major frameworks plus emerging legislation. Unlike Europe, where GDPR sets a common baseline, the Americas has jurisdictional variation that requires careful segmentation of compliance efforts. This guide covers the dominant regimes and helps banks understand how proposed federal legislation could reshape the competitive environment.
Brazil's Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados (LGPD) took effect on September 18, 2020, and has become the benchmark privacy law for Latin America. The LGPD is heavily GDPR-influenced, meaning banks with EU compliance programs may find substantial parallels, though Brazil's enforcement approach differs markedly.
The Autoridade Nacional de Proteção de Dados (ANPD) is Brazil's independent data protection authority and has jurisdiction to investigate violations, issue sanctions, and set enforcement priorities. The ANPD began imposing penalties on August 1, 2021, and has demonstrated aggressive enforcement against major technology companies and financial services providers. For non-compliance, penalties reach up to 2 percent of an organization's revenue in Brazil, capped at 50 million Brazilian reals per violation. Repeated or severe violations can trigger criminal liability.
The LGPD grants data subjects rights to request review of automated decision-making that significantly affects their interests. When a data subject requests a review, the controller must provide "clear and adequate information regarding the criteria and procedures used for an automated decision." This right parallels the GDPR's Article 22 obligations but remains less developed in case law than its European counterpart. Brazilian courts are still establishing precedent around what constitutes adequate explanation.
For financial services specifically, the LGPD interacts with Central Bank of Brazil (BCB) regulations on open banking and data sharing between financial institutions. The BCB has issued its own data protection guidelines that layer onto LGPD requirements. Banks must ensure that customer data shared in open banking arrangements maintains the same level of protection across recipients.
The ANPD's 2024–2025 enforcement roadmap prioritizes AI and facial recognition use cases, as well as children's data protection. Recent enforcement actions against major technology platforms, in which the ANPD suspended processing operations immediately upon finding inadequate safeguards, signal that the authority will act decisively. Banks should ensure that any AI systems deployed for customer profiling, risk assessment, or fraud detection have clear documentation of the fairness testing, bias mitigation, and explainability measures in place.
Canada's current privacy framework is governed by the Personal Information Protection and Data Act (PIPEDA), a 2000-era law that applies to private sector organizations handling personal information. PIPEDA sets out ten privacy principles including collection, use and disclosure, accuracy, safeguards, openness, individual access, complaint handling, and management of information. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) enforces PIPEDA and has broad authority to investigate and issue compliance orders, though financial penalties under the current regime are limited.
For years, PIPEDA has been understood as outdated. In 2022, the federal government introduced Bill C-27, the Digital Charter Implementation Act, which proposed three major legislative components to modernize Canadian privacy law: the Consumer Privacy Protection Act (CPPA), the Personal Information and Data Protection Tribunal Act (PIDPTA), and the Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA).
The proposed CPPA would replace PIPEDA's consumer privacy provisions with stricter requirements. It would grant individuals explicit rights to move or delete their data, impose stricter rules for handling minors' information, and enhance transparency around how organizations collect and use personal data. Penalties under the CPPA would reach 5 percent of global revenue or 25 million Canadian dollars, whichever is higher, representing a dramatic increase from PIPEDA's limited enforcement tools.
The proposed AIDA would establish Canada's first federal framework for regulating artificial intelligence systems. AIDA would set common requirements for the design, development, and use of AI systems, including measures to mitigate risks of harm and biased output. The governance approach in AIDA emphasizes risk-based regulation, with stricter requirements for high-impact AI systems that could materially affect rights, safety, or security.
However, a critical development occurred in January 2025: Parliament was prorogued, and Bill C-27 officially died on the Order Paper before reaching a vote. Both the CPPA and AIDA were casualties. Canada continues to operate under PIPEDA, a law drafted 25 years ago with no federal AI governance framework in place. This creates a regulatory vacuum in which Canadian banks operate GDPR-comparable AI systems with 2000-era privacy law oversight. Federal Privacy Commissioner guidance has filled some gaps, but legislative modernization remains uncertain for 2026 and beyond.
This uncertainty creates strategic risk for banks. You should maintain compliance with PIPEDA's current requirements while preparing infrastructure capable of supporting CPPA-level requirements if federal legislation eventually passes. This includes data deletion and portability infrastructure, documentation of AI system design and fairness testing, and governance structures that exceed current PIPEDA expectations.
Mexico's Federal Law on Protection of Personal Data Held by Private Parties (LFPDPPP) underwent significant updates in 2025, bringing stricter compliance rules and penalties reaching millions of pesos for violations. The law grants data subjects rights to access, rectify, and delete personal data, and imposes notice requirements similar to GDPR.
Argentina passed Resolution No. 126/2024 on June 1, 2024, establishing a new classification of sanctions for violations of the existing Data Protection Law. The change refined how Argentina's data protection authority (the Access to Public Information Agency) categorizes and penalizes breaches, creating clearer guidance for compliance but also increasing penalties for certain violation categories.
Chile's Congress passed the Personal Data Protection Bill on August 26, 2024, and the bill is currently under review by the Constitutional Court before it can be enacted. The bill modernizes Chile's data protection framework and aligns it with GDPR principles, introducing stronger data subject rights, stricter consent requirements, and explicit AI governance provisions. Once enacted, likely in 2026, it will represent a significant compliance shift for banks operating in Chile.
Colombia is pursuing comprehensive reform of its existing General Data Protection Regulation, with proposals focused on aligning Colombia's regime with international standards including GDPR. Key reform areas include establishing new legal bases for legitimate data processing, limiting data processing durations, reducing incident reporting timelines, and granting data subjects the right to not be subjected to fully automated decisions. These reforms are under legislative consideration and could take effect in 2026 or 2027.
The regional trend is clear: Latin America is moving toward GDPR-aligned frameworks with explicit AI governance provisions. Banks operating across multiple Americas jurisdictions should design compliance programs around GDPR-equivalent standards for data subject rights, transparency, and breach response, then layer jurisdiction-specific requirements on top. This approach provides coverage for current regimes while preparing infrastructure for inevitable future changes.
Banks operating across the Americas face a fragmented but rapidly converging compliance environment. Brazil's LGPD is the most developed and actively enforced framework in the region, setting a de facto benchmark for Latin American compliance programs. The LGPD's automated decision-making rights, combined with the ANPD's stated enforcement priorities around AI systems, mean that banks with Brazilian operations must immediately ensure their AI governance documentation is current and defensible.
In Canada, the legislative uncertainty around Bill C-27 and AIDA creates a planning challenge. The prudent approach is to build compliance infrastructure that would satisfy the proposed CPPA requirements, even though they have not yet passed into law. Organizations that invested in GDPR-comparable governance ahead of Canadian legislative reform will be significantly better positioned if and when federal modernization occurs.
Across the emerging Latin American frameworks — Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Argentina — the direction of travel is consistent: stronger consent requirements, broader data subject rights, expanded transparency around automated decision-making, and meaningfully higher penalties. Banks that anchor their Americas compliance programs to the LGPD's GDPR-influenced framework will find themselves reasonably well prepared for the next generation of regional legislation.
Corvair helps financial institutions manage the Americas privacy complexity by mapping LGPD, PIPEDA, and emerging frameworks to your specific bank operations, tracking proposed legislation so you understand timing and preparedness needs, and building automated compliance workflows for data subject rights requests and automated decision-making disclosures. Our regional compliance expert network stays current on enforcement trends so you understand where regulators are focusing their attention.
Schedule a BriefingCalifornia's Consumer Privacy Act and the California Privacy Rights Act govern data practices for financial institutions serving California residents, with specific AI and profiling provisions.
Read guideThe Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act's financial privacy provisions govern how US financial institutions collect, use, and share customer financial information.
Read guideThe Equal Credit Opportunity Act and fair lending laws impose anti-discrimination obligations on algorithmic credit decisioning — a critical AI governance consideration for US banks.
Read guide