From zero to a governed, production agent in 6 weeks.
Most enterprises recognise the potential of agentic AI but face a chicken-and-egg problem: governance teams have nothing to govern, and delivery teams are told they cannot deploy without governance. The result is paralysis, or worse, ungoverned shadow AI deployed by individual teams who got tired of waiting.
The Sprint Factory breaks the deadlock. It uses an agile, sprint-based methodology to design, build, and deploy a single governed AI agent use case in 4 to 6 weeks, with full governance baked in from Day 1. The first use case becomes the proof point that justifies the broader governance investment, the CoE charter, and the enterprise roadmap.
This is not a proof-of-concept that gets thrown away. Every Sprint Factory engagement produces a production-grade agent operating under Corvair's Architecture-First governance controls, measured to Six Sigma standards, and aligned to applicable regulatory frameworks.
For organisations that have not yet identified or prioritised their agentic AI use cases.
For organisations that already have a prioritised use case and want to move straight to delivery.
Build an ROI-prioritised agentic AI roadmap and select the first use case for Sprint Factory delivery.
Every candidate use case is scored on two axes: Impact and Feasibility. The composite score determines priority. The framework is deliberately designed to select use cases that will succeed, because the first agent must succeed to unlock everything that follows.
| Criterion | Weight | Scoring |
|---|---|---|
| Time Recaptured | 15% | Hours per week of knowledge worker time currently consumed by the manual version of this process. Higher is better. |
| Error Reduction | 10% | Current failure rate, rework rate, or exception rate of the manual process. Processes with known, measurable failure modes score highest. |
| Cost Avoidance | 10% | Direct cost savings: FTE time, vendor costs, penalty avoidance, or revenue leakage eliminated. |
| Strategic Leverage | 5% | Does success in this use case unlock downstream use cases, build organisational capability, or create reusable components? |
Feasibility is weighted more heavily than impact because the first use case must succeed. A high-impact use case that fails damages the entire programme.
| Criterion | Weight | Scoring |
|---|---|---|
| Data Availability | 15% | Is the required data already accessible, structured, and of acceptable quality? Or does it require new integrations, cleaning, or permissions? |
| Process Clarity | 15% | Is the current process well-documented and well-understood? Are the decision rules explicit, or buried in tribal knowledge? Processes with clear, documented SOPs score highest. |
| Ease of Implementation | 10% | Technical complexity: number of system integrations, API maturity, authentication complexity, data volume. Fewer dependencies mean a higher score. |
| Fallback Process Available | 10% | Can the organisation revert to the manual process instantly if the agent fails? A robust fallback eliminates deployment risk. This is non-negotiable for the first use case. |
| Audience (Internal vs. External) | 10% | Internal-audience use cases score higher for the first deployment. Customer-facing use cases carry reputational risk that should not burden the proof-of-concept. |
| Use Case | Why It Scores Well |
|---|---|
| Regulatory change monitoring & impact triage | High volume of regulatory updates; structured inputs (publications, circulars); well-understood triage logic; internal audience only; existing manual process is time-consuming and error-prone |
| Internal IT service desk triage & routing | High ticket volume; repetitive classification; well-documented resolution paths; instant fallback (human agent takes over); internal audience |
| Compliance exception report generation | Repetitive data gathering from multiple systems; templated output format; clear rules for escalation; internal audience; currently consumes 4 to 8 hours per report |
| Vendor risk assessment pre-screening | Structured questionnaire inputs; checklist-based evaluation; well-defined scoring criteria; human reviewer makes final decision; internal audience |
| Meeting action item extraction & follow-up tracking | High frequency (daily); simple NLP task; structured output; internal audience; low governance risk; immediate productivity gain |
| Data quality exception triage | High volume of data quality alerts; 80% follow known resolution patterns; structured inputs; internal data team audience; measurable reduction in resolution time |
Comprehensive catalogue of 15 to 30 candidate use cases with owner, process area, and preliminary scoring.
Sequenced pipeline of 3 to 5 prioritised use cases over 6 to 12 months with recommended sprint timelines and dependencies.
Detailed specification for the selected first use case covering problem statement, target audience, data sources, integration points, success criteria, fallback process, and governance requirements.
Not a prototype. A real agent processing real work under real governance.
Registry entry, identity credentials, blast radius model, regulatory mapping, kill switch configuration, and compliance checklist.
Statistical performance baselines with Six Sigma process control metrics.
Operational procedures for monitoring, escalation, drift detection, and retraining.
Quantified measurement of human time recaptured, error reduction, and cost avoidance.
Lessons learned and a recommendation for the next Sprint Factory cycle.
This is not a strategy engagement that produces a report. In 6 weeks, your organisation has a governed agent in production, measured to Six Sigma standards, with a clear operational handover. No other firm combines Lean Six Sigma process control with patent-pending agentic AI governance architecture and hands-on agent delivery in a single sprint-based engagement.
The methodology treats every agent deployment as a quality-controlled manufacturing process: define the process, measure the baseline, analyse the defects, improve the design, control the output.
The Sprint Factory is also designed to be repeatable. Each cycle builds governance capability. The registry grows, the entitlement layer expands, the DMAIC baselines accumulate, and the organisation's governance muscle strengthens. By the third or fourth cycle, the CoE is effectively bootstrapped from the bottom up.
| Service | Relationship |
|---|---|
| MAS AIRG Readiness Assessment | The assessment identifies governance gaps; the Sprint Factory demonstrates how those gaps are closed in practice through a real deployment. |
| AI Governance Framework Design | The framework provides the policy architecture; the Sprint Factory instantiates it for a specific use case. |
| Agentic AI Risk & Controls Workshop | The workshop educates teams on agentic AI risk; the Sprint Factory gives them hands-on experience governing a real agent. |
| Fractional AI Governance Advisor | The fractional advisor provides ongoing oversight; the Sprint Factory accelerates the first deployment that the advisor will then govern. |
| Data & AI CoE for Agentic AI | The Sprint Factory bootstraps governance capability from the bottom up; the CoE service scales it from the top down. They are complementary entry points for different organisational maturity levels. |
Your teams are waiting for permission to deploy. Give them a governed path to production in 6 weeks.
Schedule a Briefing View CoE Service