On-Demand Claims Score: 3.85/5.0

Subrogation & Recovery Optimisation

On-Demand Knowledge Work | Internal audience

The Problem

Subrogation identifies third-party liability opportunities , chances to recover claim payments from responsible parties or their insurers. Current process: claims adjusters manually review closed/open claims for liability signals (police reports, witness statements), manually cross-reference legal liability frameworks (state comparative negligence rules, contractual liability, insurance policy subrogation clauses), manually identify and pursue recovery actions. High caseloads (50-100+ claims per adjuster) lead to missed opportunities and lapsed statutes of limitation. Subrogation leakage: $500K-$2M+/year per mid-size insurer.

What the Agent Does

Data Requirements

Data Sources:

Data Classification:

Data Quality Requirements:

Police report accuracy: 100% sourced from government agencies. Claim narrative completeness: 95%+ of claims have narrative descriptions. Historical recovery rate accuracy: tracked and validated against actual recovery outcomes. Legal framework accuracy: must match current state law (updated with regulatory changes).

Integration Complexity: Medium-High , Requires ClaimCenter/Majesco API integration, police report API integration (if available; may require manual upload), dashcam/photo database access, NLP for claim narrative analysis, legal framework database maintenance, historical recovery rate database (internal or sourced).

Score Breakdown

Criterion Weight Score (1-5) Weighted
Time Recaptured 15% 4 0.60
Error Reduction 10% 5 0.50
Cost Avoidance 10% 4 0.40
Strategic Leverage 5% 4 0.20
Data Availability 15% 4 0.60
Process Clarity 15% 4 0.60
Ease of Implementation 10% 3 0.30
Fallback Available 10% 3 0.30
Audience (Int/Ext) 10% 5 0.50
Composite 100% 3.85

Why It Scores Well

Claims data is readily available (internal). Recovery opportunities are high-value (average subrogation recovery: $5K-$50K per successful case). Automation is high-impact (most opportunities currently missed due to manual process limitations). Fallback is straightforward: adjuster manually identifies opportunities. Internal audience. Clear ROI: recover $500K-$2M+/year per insurer. Regulatory benefit: systematic subrogation process improves audit readiness and demonstrates financial control.

Regulatory Alignment

Sprint Factory Fit

Sprint 0 (2 weeks) + 3 build sprints (6 weeks)

Sprint 0: Claims database schema analysis, liability signal taxonomy, legal framework mapping, recovery opportunity ranking logic, third-party contact database

Build Sprints 1-3: ClaimCenter API integration, police report ingestion, dashcam/photo database access, NLP for claim narrative analysis, liability mapping rules, recovery ranking algorithm, subrogation filing template generation, specialist escalation workflow, recovery outcome tracking and feedback loop

Comparable Implementations

Deploy This Use Case with the Sprint Factory

From zero to a governed, production agent in 6 weeks.

Sprint Factory Schedule a Briefing

Related Use Cases